The Philosophy of Jo Nagamine’s Maya Logic System (MLS):
The Foundation for Proactive Behavioral Design, Free from Determinism
I. The Core Declaration: MLS as a Framework for Awareness
The foundation of Jo Nagamine’s Maya Logic System (MLS) lies in a philosophical commitment to reproducibility of action, explicitly excluding fortune-telling or predictions of fate and judgment of good/bad luck. We have reconstructed the universal wisdom of the ancient Maya as an ethical framework for the optimization of action logic.
1. All Analysis is a “Framework for Awareness”
Every methodology used to analyze human traits and behavior—be it logical interpretation (calendrical systems), psychology, neuroscience, or big data—is merely a different “lens” (framework) for viewing reality.
- Exclusion of Superiority: We believe there is no inherent superiority among these frameworks. MLS’s logic is based on the universal structure of the calendar, which possesses value independent of statistics that change over time.
- Philosophy vs. Science: The value of MLS lies in its logical consistency and universal structure, which belongs to the domain of philosophy and ethics, not the physical proof of science.
We position MLS not from the perspective of seeking scientific evidence, but as a “Framework for Awareness that possesses logical consistency and a universal structure for behavioral change.”
2. MLS Value: Providing Objective “Constraints”
The value of MLS does not lie in predicting the future or providing definitive conclusions.
- Providing Logical Constraints: MLS specializes in offering “constraints on individual action logic (positioning)” based on objective logic, such as Personal Tzolkin, which yields the same result regardless of who calculates it.
- Focus on Reproducibility: By utilizing these constraints, the system helps identify unconscious brakes and inefficient action patterns, leading to the reproducibility of action independent of subjective feelings.
3. The Responsibility of Final Choice and Ethics
The true value of any framework ultimately depends on the ethics and subjectivity of the human utilizing it.
MLS delegates the “final choice and responsibility” of what to derive from this framework and how to implement behavioral change entirely to the user’s subjectivity.
MLS is designed with the prerequisite that users will ethically utilize the logical insights provided for self-improvement, understanding others, and contributing to society. As an intelligent and responsible system, MLS supports your proactive and ethical behavioral transformation.
II. The Three Pillars of Philosophy: The Core MLS Logic
The MLS philosophy adopts these three core principles to establish the logic of behavioral change, liberating the analysis from fatalism. These principles collectively create the “space for choice” in your actions.
1. Freeing Analysis from Determination: The Lens Theory
Analytical results are not a determined “fate” but rather a “lens” that removes subjective bias and cuts through a specific facet of reality.
2. Creating the “Space for Choice”: The Utilization of Bipolarity
MLS rejects ending analysis with “good/bad” judgment. By viewing results through the duality of Positive Aspect (Leverage) and Negative Aspect (Challenge), we release action from the paralysis of definitive judgment, enabling proactive strategic design.
▶︎ [Deep Dive: The Utilization of Bipolarity (Dual Perspective) (dual-perspective)]
3. Resolving the Paralysis of Infinite Choice: Creative Constraints
To resolve the action paralysis caused by infinite possibility, MLS actively uses Tzolkin themes as a proactive “constraint.” This philosophy unlocks human creativity by forcing the search for the optimal solution within a defined framework.
▶︎ [Deep Dive: How Creative Constraints Unlock Creativity (creative-constraints)]